Musings from a Lighting Designer Comments http://www.wowlighting.co.uk/lightingblog Thoughts on developments in the world of lighting design and lighting products Wed, 08 Sep 2010 12:27:14 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.3 by: Joseph http://www.wowlighting.co.uk/lightingblog/?p=67#comment-426 Thu, 23 Nov 2006 18:41:08 +0000 http://www.wowlighting.co.uk/lightingblog/?p=67#comment-426 <strong>Yep</strong> Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day; teach him to use the Net and he won't bother you for weeks. Yep

Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day;
teach him to use the Net and he won’t bother you for weeks.

]]> by: Hannah http://www.wowlighting.co.uk/lightingblog/?p=67#comment-419 Wed, 01 Nov 2006 10:25:11 +0000 http://www.wowlighting.co.uk/lightingblog/?p=67#comment-419 <strong>Look good</strong> Reboot America. Look good

Reboot America.

]]> by: Free Sex http://www.wowlighting.co.uk/lightingblog/?p=30#comment-384 Tue, 11 Jul 2006 19:23:16 +0000 http://www.wowlighting.co.uk/lightingblog/?p=30#comment-384 <strong>Everybody is looking for Free Sex. Find your free sex Porn Downloads here.</strong> Everybody is looking for Free Sex. Find your free sex Porn Downloads here. Everybody is looking for Free Sex.

Find your free sex Porn Downloads here.

Everybody is looking for Free Sex.

Find your free sex Porn Downloads here.

]]> by: Patrick http://www.wowlighting.co.uk/lightingblog/?p=33#comment-2 Sat, 21 Jan 2006 21:40:25 +0000 http://www.wowlighting.co.uk/lightingblog/?p=33#comment-2 With regard to the 25% fluorescent light "requirement" . . . is this what the BR "guidance" says, or is this what the BR "regulation" says? Often the reguation, which is what is enforced, is based on the principle, in this case of reducing say "normal" energy consumption by a certain %. This is what can and is enforced. The "guidance" details the hands-down example of how this can be achieved, so if your building has 25% fluorescent they won't ask any questions. I have found BR officers quite understanding on such matters. If you explain intelligently in the BR documents that you submit they will accept alternative schemes as compliant if you satify the principle. Maybe I am being too optimistic, but If they do not accept intelligent alternatives that work just as well then there must be some way of appealing the decision. With regard to the 25% fluorescent light “requirement” . . . is this what the BR “guidance” says, or is this what the BR “regulation” says?

Often the reguation, which is what is enforced, is based on the principle, in this case of reducing say “normal” energy consumption by a certain %. This is what can and is enforced. The “guidance” details the hands-down example of how this can be achieved, so if your building has 25% fluorescent they won’t ask any questions.

I have found BR officers quite understanding on such matters. If you explain intelligently in the BR documents that you submit they will accept alternative schemes as compliant if you satify the principle.

Maybe I am being too optimistic, but If they do not accept intelligent alternatives that work just as well then there must be some way of appealing the decision.

]]> by: Mr WordPress http://www.wowlighting.co.uk/lightingblog/?p=1#comment-1 Sat, 29 Oct 2005 13:35:46 +0000 http://www.wowlighting.co.uk/lightingblog/?p=1#comment-1 Every day I receive news items about state of the art developments in the world of lighting design and lighting products. I intend sharing the more interesting of these in my daily blog. Every day I receive news items about state of the art developments in the world of lighting design and lighting products. I intend sharing the more interesting of these in my daily blog.

]]>